Hamilton Herald Masthead

Editorial


Front Page - Friday, April 11, 2014

Tennessee Appellate Court Opinions




State of Tennessee v. Angela K. Pendergrass

Case Number: E2013-01409-CCA-R3-CD

Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.

Originating Judge: Judge Don W. Poole

Date Filed: Tuesday, March 25, 2014

The defendant, Angela K. Pendergrass, appeals her Hamilton County Criminal Court bench trial conviction of driving under the influence. Discerning no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Demetrius Marcelle Smith

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County

Case Number: E2013-01796-CCA-R3-CD

Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Originating Judge: Judge Barry A. Steelman

Date Filed: Monday, April 7, 2014

The Defendant, Demetrius Marcelle Smith, appeals the revocation of his probation by the Hamilton County Criminal Court. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred in revoking his probation and ordering his sentence into execution. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the Hamilton County Criminal Court.Randall Turner v. State of Tennessee

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County

Case Number: E2013-01565-CCA-R3-PC

Authoring Judge: Judge Roger A. Page

Originating Judge: Judge Don W. Poole

Date Filed: Monday, April 7, 2014

Petitioner, Randall Turner, pleaded guilty to first degree murder, aggravated kidnapping, and two counts of aggravated robbery, for which he received agreed-upon sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and thirty years. The pro se petitioner filed the instant petition for post-conviction relief, in which he requested DNA analysis of his “clothing, pants, shoes and socks” as well as a witness’s “pajamas.” The post-conviction court summarily dismissed the petition, and this appeal follows. On appeal, petitioner argues that the post-conviction court should have: (1) recused itself from considering his case; (2) appointed counsel to represent petitioner; and (3) granted his petition for DNA testing. After our review of the parties’ briefs, the scant record before this court, and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.   v